Comments for MetsProspectHub http://www.metsprospecthub.com Your central source for news, opinions, insight and analysis of Mets Prospects. Hosted by Tejesh and David Sat, 04 May 2013 01:49:35 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3 Comment on 4/21 Minor League Report (Robles, Harris) by Miguel Angel garcia http://www.metsprospecthub.com/minor-league-report/421-minor-league-report-robles-harris/comment-page-1/#comment-9004 Miguel Angel garcia Sat, 04 May 2013 01:49:35 +0000 http://www.metsprospecthub.com/?p=5080#comment-9004 Remarkable things here. I'm very happy to look your article. Thanks so much and I'm having a look ahead to contact you. Will you please drop me a e-mail? Remarkable things here. I’m very happy to look your article. Thanks so much and I’m having a look ahead to contact you. Will you please drop me a e-mail?

]]> Comment on MetsProspectHub Preseason 2013 Top 35 Prospects by Marc http://www.metsprospecthub.com/minor-league-report/metsprospecthub-preseason-2013-top-35-prospects/comment-page-1/#comment-8796 Marc Sun, 17 Mar 2013 13:26:58 +0000 http://www.metsprospecthub.com/?p=4991#comment-8796 I can't really argue with the top 9 (outside of Mejia, which you explained). I think the grouping of Evans Cecchini and Plawecki together is a good call - time will tell which ones become regulars and which are solid backups. I agree that Evans is under appreciated, but I also think you are a little over-negative when you write about Cecchini (though I can't argue with the actual ranking). He doesn't do anything too sexy, but scouts really love the pick. #105 is actually really good for a 19 yr-old. He'll pretty much follow Evans step by step, but we'll have to see if Evans can remain at Short. As for the top 10, I agree that you can't quite put Ynoa in there yet, but I might bump A-Rod up there. And, I know you tried to slip Akeel in there, but I think it's abou thet time that he has to show some ability to throw strikes. Either that, or go to Ricky Vaughn's optometrist. I can’t really argue with the top 9 (outside of Mejia, which you explained). I think the grouping of Evans Cecchini and Plawecki together is a good call – time will tell which ones become regulars and which are solid backups. I agree that Evans is under appreciated, but I also think you are a little over-negative when you write about Cecchini (though I can’t argue with the actual ranking). He doesn’t do anything too sexy, but scouts really love the pick. #105 is actually really good for a 19 yr-old. He’ll pretty much follow Evans step by step, but we’ll have to see if Evans can remain at Short.
As for the top 10, I agree that you can’t quite put Ynoa in there yet, but I might bump A-Rod up there. And, I know you tried to slip Akeel in there, but I think it’s abou thet time that he has to show some ability to throw strikes. Either that, or go to Ricky Vaughn’s optometrist.

]]> Comment on The future is exceedingly BRIGHT by Tejesh http://www.metsprospecthub.com/minor-league-report/the-future-is-exceedingly-bright/comment-page-1/#comment-8761 Tejesh Thu, 20 Dec 2012 00:49:13 +0000 http://www.metsprospecthub.com/?p=4987#comment-8761 Vaughn was an oversight. Lagares is so meh it's like the word was invented for him. Lutz is ALWAYS hurt. Vaughn was an oversight. Lagares is so meh it’s like the word was invented for him. Lutz is ALWAYS hurt.

]]> Comment on The future is exceedingly BRIGHT by LTHFanClubPrez http://www.metsprospecthub.com/minor-league-report/the-future-is-exceedingly-bright/comment-page-1/#comment-8758 LTHFanClubPrez Wed, 19 Dec 2012 18:07:15 +0000 http://www.metsprospecthub.com/?p=4987#comment-8758 Also, where is the love for Lutz and Lagares? Also, I think Havens puts it together this year. Also, where is the love for Lutz and Lagares? Also, I think Havens puts it together this year.

]]> Comment on The future is exceedingly BRIGHT by Marc http://www.metsprospecthub.com/minor-league-report/the-future-is-exceedingly-bright/comment-page-1/#comment-8751 Marc Tue, 18 Dec 2012 17:13:38 +0000 http://www.metsprospecthub.com/?p=4987#comment-8751 Yeah, pretty stoked about the influx of talent. 2 questions: 1) No love for Cory Vaughn? 2) Why the dislike for Plawecki? Guy doesn't strike out, plays good defensively, smart kid, and actually started to show a little pop last year. This year, it will be absolutely vital for one of the OF prospects: (Duda, Kirk, DD, JV, Puello, Vaughn) to do SOMETHING to prove they belong in the majors. This is the only glaring hole left on the team and in the system, and unfortunately, power hitting OFers are at a premium league-wide right now. Yeah, pretty stoked about the influx of talent. 2 questions:
1) No love for Cory Vaughn?
2) Why the dislike for Plawecki? Guy doesn’t strike out, plays good defensively, smart kid, and actually started to show a little pop last year.

This year, it will be absolutely vital for one of the OF prospects: (Duda, Kirk, DD, JV, Puello, Vaughn) to do SOMETHING to prove they belong in the majors. This is the only glaring hole left on the team and in the system, and unfortunately, power hitting OFers are at a premium league-wide right now.

]]> Comment on Post-Mortium on MPH? by Marc http://www.metsprospecthub.com/minor-league-report/post-mortium-on-mph/comment-page-1/#comment-8546 Marc Sat, 13 Oct 2012 16:46:00 +0000 http://www.metsprospecthub.com/?p=4966#comment-8546 Well, every once in a while, some video of a top prospect gets posted on one of a variety of websites. I know I've seen some on Wheeler and Flores on random sites. Maybe see if you can get some kinds of scouting archives and see how their swings/pitches develop over time. May or may not be less tedious, but there are a number of reports when players are drafted, then there are a couple at the end of the year here and there, there isn't a whole lot of follow up on how the prospects are doing at improving in the specific areas mentioned at the beginning of the season (level swing, identify breaking pitches). Just an idea, but providing updates one player at a time throughout the year. Well, every once in a while, some video of a top prospect gets posted on one of a variety of websites. I know I’ve seen some on Wheeler and Flores on random sites. Maybe see if you can get some kinds of scouting archives and see how their swings/pitches develop over time. May or may not be less tedious, but there are a number of reports when players are drafted, then there are a couple at the end of the year here and there, there isn’t a whole lot of follow up on how the prospects are doing at improving in the specific areas mentioned at the beginning of the season (level swing, identify breaking pitches). Just an idea, but providing updates one player at a time throughout the year.

]]> Comment on Post-Mortium on MPH? by Tejesh http://www.metsprospecthub.com/minor-league-report/post-mortium-on-mph/comment-page-1/#comment-8536 Tejesh Fri, 12 Oct 2012 00:12:26 +0000 http://www.metsprospecthub.com/?p=4966#comment-8536 Go in depth in what manner? I only have access to the same things you do, boxscores and Gamedays and the like. Go in depth in what manner? I only have access to the same things you do, boxscores and Gamedays and the like.

]]> Comment on Post-Mortium on MPH? by Marc http://www.metsprospecthub.com/minor-league-report/post-mortium-on-mph/comment-page-1/#comment-8532 Marc Thu, 11 Oct 2012 18:59:40 +0000 http://www.metsprospecthub.com/?p=4966#comment-8532 Hi Tejesh, No question that the site has not been the same the last year - year and a half. Maybe you should re-format so it isn't as much of a chore. You already give daily updates on the top prospects for each team. Why not instead go into more depth on a select few at a time (one or two). That way you don't have to go through all the stats every day, and you can focus, instead, on the stories that really matter. I check your site every day, so I would miss not having it. I'd just like to find more stuff worth spending a few minutes to read and digest. Best regards, Marc Hi Tejesh,
No question that the site has not been the same the last year – year and a half. Maybe you should re-format so it isn’t as much of a chore. You already give daily updates on the top prospects for each team. Why not instead go into more depth on a select few at a time (one or two). That way you don’t have to go through all the stats every day, and you can focus, instead, on the stories that really matter.
I check your site every day, so I would miss not having it. I’d just like to find more stuff worth spending a few minutes to read and digest.

Best regards,
Marc

]]> Comment on Hey guys… by Jeff http://www.metsprospecthub.com/minor-league-report/hey-guys-2/comment-page-1/#comment-6817 Jeff Mon, 07 May 2012 02:05:22 +0000 http://www.metsprospecthub.com/?p=4408#comment-6817 I still read, keep it up! I still read, keep it up!

]]> Comment on 4/9 Minor League Report! Peavey, Marte, Cecilliani, Vaughn, Pill, Leathersich! by TW http://www.metsprospecthub.com/minor-league-report/49-minor-league-report-peavey-marte-cecilliani-vaughn-pill-leathersich/comment-page-1/#comment-6622 TW Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:52:40 +0000 http://www.metsprospecthub.com/?p=4350#comment-6622 LOVE this format today! Keep up the good work. LOVE this format today! Keep up the good work.

]]>